Archive for September, 2005

Is Hell exothermic or endothermic?

Monday, September 5th, 2005

This is reputed to be a true story from the Engineering Dept. of Texas A&M University.

A physics professor had written a take-home exam for his graduate students. The exam consisted of only one question:
“Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Support your answer with a proof.”

Most students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed), or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing with time. Thus, we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell, and the rate they are leaving. I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people don’t belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we must look at the rate of change of the volume of Hell, because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to remain the same, the volume of Hell must expand as souls are added. This produces two possibilities:

(1) If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure of Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

(2) Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase in the number of souls entering Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

So, which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Therese Banyan during my freshman year, “It will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you!” and taking into account the fact that I have not succeeded in sleeping with her, then #2 cannot be true, so Hell is exothermic.

The student received the only “A” in the class.

Phone call at Carey front office

Thursday, September 1st, 2005

Back then Carey front desk used to charge student for making a local call (if they were sick or emergency matters and need to call home) but I guess they are smarter now days and actually got rid of it :)
However I have a little story to share:

Lets say Person A didnt have any cash with him but he needed to make a phone call. So he went to the front office and asked for a IOU phone call. So they wrote down his name and asked him to pay 20 cents the day after. However Person A didnt pay and after a month he recieved a letter from the school saying that he owes the front office 20 cents for the phone call.. Right…

We Assume that

Phone call = 20 cents
Stamp = 50 cents
Envelope = 5 cents
Letter Head + Ink = 10 cents
Labour = [ $25/hour - Time Taken To Type A Letter :: ~5 minutes]
= ~ 2 dollar

It cost the front office 20 cents for a local phone call and however they sent a letter back to Person A’s house. Stamp for the letter cost 50 cents, envelope cost 5 cents, Pretty letter head and ink cost 10 cents, labour for 5 minutes of typing would be approx. 2 dollar.

So.. if Person A decided not to pay the front office any way, that would be another 20 cents on top of those cost. You do the math and if im not wrong it all comes up to $2.85.

Well for a 20 cents phone call and they’ve decided to spend another $2.65 (excl. 20 cents because they think that the person will pay them back) just to get the 20 cents.

SMART ? I dont think so…